<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Case Studies &#8211; Wilkins Southworth</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/category/case-studies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk</link>
	<description>Chartered Certified Accountants, Registered Auditors and Specialist Personal and Corporate Tax Advisers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 11:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Slumdog or Millionaire?</title>
		<link>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/slumdog-or-millionaire/</link>
					<comments>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/slumdog-or-millionaire/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris-Wilkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 16:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wilkinssouthworth.live-website.com/?p=800</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tax-saving strategies for small businesses in a tough economic climate Slumdog Millionaire or Slumdog? Rolls Royce tastes with Ford Fiesta income? Forget about lavish lifestyles, 2009 will be a year of survival mode. Banish the luxuries, batten down the hatches, survive and exist! As my old lecturer used to say, turnover is vanity, profit is sanity but cash is king! All is not lost if you managed to meet January&#8217;s tax return filing deadline, but need to subsequently adjust it. You have twelve months to revise your tax return after it has been filed. Therefore, you still have time to save money! All very well and good, but how do we get cash/income? Well there are two ways at looking at a profit and loss account to derive profit/cash. Either increase turnover and debtors, hence cash or decrease expenses, creditors and costs. However, if you have already done that, what else can you do to increase the bottom line? Well, how about taking advantage of the tax laws. Saturday 31 January was the deadline for filing tax returns. If you managed to meet that deadline, but have missed out on some of the valuable concessions highlighted below, all is not lost. You have twelve months to revise your tax return after it has been filed. Therefore, you still have time to save money! It seems that the old adage is relevant here: &#8220;It is not what you make that is important, it is what you keep.&#8221; And whilst we assume only the rich need accountants, you do not always need to be rich to engage one. As Chris Wilkins of Wilkins Southworth, Chartered Certified Accountants explains tax does not have to be taxing. In 2009, this could not be more important. There are a number of case studies of clients that may be beneficial to bear in mind: Mr Artesian Was made redundant from his PAYE employment and wanted to retrain as a self employed Boiler Engineer. He was concerned that because he was new to the trade, he would not be able to make ends meet in his first year or so. His redundancy money kept the wolf from the door, but his accountant put the jam on the table. In particular, whilst the government have offered some tax relief for the carry back of losses, this only applies for accounting periods ending in the year ended 5 April 2009. However, you have always been able to take advantage of the three year carry back rule. Oh, that one I hear you say. Yes that one. The one that says that any trading loss made in the first four years of a new trade can be carried back up to three years against prior year earnings. For example, if Mr Artesian was particularly lucky then he may have received a redundancy payment and some of it (up to a maximum of £30,000) may have been tax free. In addition to that, as he has taken up a new vocation and if the vocation makes a loss in the first four years of trade and this loss includes claiming capital allowances, then we can ask Mr Darling to assist with our cashflow. Thus the loss in the first year of the new trade could be carried back three years when Mr Artesian was in PAYE employment. If he is very lucky, Mr Artesian in the year ended 5 April 2006, may have been a 40% tax payer, so we may get a tax refund on our loss at 40%! In addition to that, as we carried back our loss three years, then the tax man has had our tax refund for three years and he will pay us interest on the money. Furthermore, if we are very unlucky to have a loss in year two, we can carry that back as well, and if we have sufficient PAYE income or indeed self-employed income, he will pay us a tax refund for that year and we will get interest on that as well. And again, in year three! Your accountancy fees are tax deductible and can be taken out of the tax refund. Any more questions? Off you go. Mr Beaufort The shipping business is not doing well, again you are not a limited company (i.e. sole trader, partnership, Limited Liability Partnership) and you have made a loss. You have been in business too long to take advantage of Mr Artesian&#8217;s situation and because of your desperate cashflow you are forced to sell an asset, in Mr Beaufort&#8217;s case a property left to him many years ago, which he rents out. Unfortunately, as he will make a profit on the sale of this property, then this capital profit will be subject to capital gains tax. Just consider the ignominy &#8211; you have made a trading loss (and cannot do anything with this as you also made a loss last year), but you have to pay tax on your capital gain! All is not lost! You should be able to offset your trading loss against the capital gain. Therefore, in this instance, Mr Beaufort&#8217;s loss was offset against his capital gain and a result that Mr Macawber would be very pleased with! Mr Canal Had a thriving building business, which was a partnership with Mr Longshore. All went well up to the end of 2007 when they had bumper profits. However, 2008 was a disastrous year with lots of customers deciding not to follow through with their orders due to the credit crunch. Mr Canal and Mr Longshore have just visited their accountant who told them that the tax payments that they are due to make on 31 January 2009 include the balance of the tax that they owe for the tax year ended 5 April 2008 (which is based on their profits for the year ended 31 December 2007) plus their first payment on account for the tax year ended 5 April 2009 (which is also based on their profits for 2007). Obviously</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/slumdog-or-millionaire/">Slumdog or Millionaire?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk">Wilkins Southworth</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="800" class="elementor elementor-800" data-elementor-post-type="post">
						<section class="elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-d4a9700 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no wpr-column-slider-no wpr-equal-height-no" data-id="d4a9700" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-0b022d6" data-id="0b022d6" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-7e2e234 ws-post elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="7e2e234" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<h1>Tax-saving strategies for small businesses in a tough economic climate</h1><p>Slumdog Millionaire or Slumdog? Rolls Royce tastes with Ford Fiesta income?</p><p>Forget about lavish lifestyles, 2009 will be a year of survival mode. Banish the luxuries, batten down the hatches, survive and exist! As my old lecturer used to say, turnover is vanity, profit is sanity but cash is king!</p><p>All is not lost if you managed to meet January&#8217;s tax return filing deadline, but need to subsequently adjust it. You have twelve months to revise your tax return after it has been filed. Therefore, you still have time to save money!</p><p>All very well and good, but how do we get cash/income? Well there are two ways at looking at a profit and loss account to derive profit/cash. Either increase turnover and debtors, hence cash or decrease expenses, creditors and costs.</p><p>However, if you have already done that, what else can you do to increase the bottom line? Well, how about taking advantage of the tax laws.</p><p>Saturday 31 January was the deadline for filing tax returns. If you managed to meet that deadline, but have missed out on some of the valuable concessions highlighted below, all is not lost. You have twelve months to revise your tax return after it has been filed. Therefore, you still have time to save money!</p><div class="boxed">It seems that the old adage is relevant here: <b>&#8220;It is not what you make that is important, it is what you keep.&#8221;</b></div><p>And whilst we assume only the rich need accountants, you do not always need to be rich to engage one. As Chris Wilkins of Wilkins Southworth, Chartered Certified Accountants explains tax does not have to be taxing. In 2009, this could not be more important. There are a number of case studies of clients that may be beneficial to bear in mind:</p><h2>Mr Artesian</h2><p>Was made redundant from his PAYE employment and wanted to retrain as a self employed Boiler Engineer. He was concerned that because he was new to the trade, he would not be able to make ends meet in his first year or so. His redundancy money kept the wolf from the door, but his accountant put the jam on the table.</p><p>In particular, whilst the government have offered some tax relief for the carry back of losses, this only applies for accounting periods ending in the year ended 5 April 2009.</p><p>However, you have always been able to take advantage of the three year carry back rule. Oh, that one I hear you say. Yes that one. The one that says that any trading loss made in the first four years of a new trade can be carried back up to three years against prior year earnings.</p><p>For example, if Mr Artesian was particularly lucky then he may have received a redundancy payment and some of it (up to a maximum of £30,000) may have been tax free. In addition to that, as he has taken up a new vocation and if the vocation makes a loss in the first four years of trade and this loss includes claiming capital allowances, then we can ask Mr Darling to assist with our cashflow. Thus the loss in the first year of the new trade could be carried back three years when Mr Artesian was in PAYE employment.</p><p>If he is very lucky, Mr Artesian in the year ended 5 April 2006, may have been a 40% tax payer, so we may get a tax refund on our loss at 40%! In addition to that, as we carried back our loss three years, then the tax man has had our tax refund for three years and he will pay us interest on the money.</p><p>Furthermore, if we are very unlucky to have a loss in year two, we can carry that back as well, and if we have sufficient PAYE income or indeed self-employed income, he will pay us a tax refund for that year and we will get interest on that as well. And again, in year three!</p><p>Your accountancy fees are tax deductible and can be taken out of the tax refund. Any more questions? Off you go.</p><h2>Mr Beaufort</h2><p>The shipping business is not doing well, again you are not a limited company (i.e. sole trader, partnership, Limited Liability Partnership) and you have made a loss. You have been in business too long to take advantage of Mr Artesian&#8217;s situation and because of your desperate cashflow you are forced to sell an asset, in Mr Beaufort&#8217;s case a property left to him many years ago, which he rents out.</p><p>Unfortunately, as he will make a profit on the sale of this property, then this capital profit will be subject to capital gains tax. Just consider the ignominy &#8211; you have made a trading loss (and cannot do anything with this as you also made a loss last year), but you have to pay tax on your capital gain!</p><p>All is not lost! You should be able to offset your trading loss against the capital gain. Therefore, in this instance, Mr Beaufort&#8217;s loss was offset against his capital gain and a result that Mr Macawber would be very pleased with!</p><h2>Mr Canal</h2><p>Had a thriving building business, which was a partnership with Mr Longshore. All went well up to the end of 2007 when they had bumper profits. However, 2008 was a disastrous year with lots of customers deciding not to follow through with their orders due to the credit crunch.</p><p>Mr Canal and Mr Longshore have just visited their accountant who told them that the tax payments that they are due to make on 31 January 2009 include the balance of the tax that they owe for the tax year ended 5 April 2008 (which is based on their profits for the year ended 31 December 2007) plus their first payment on account for the tax year ended 5 April 2009 (which is also based on their profits for 2007). Obviously this badly affects their cashflow.</p><p>However, you can make a claim to reduce the payment-on-account element of the tax payment due on 31 January 2009 and also 31 July 2009 to your actual profits for the year ended 31 December 2008, when profits would be a lot lower.</p><h2>Mr Dredger</h2><p>Had a long established self-employed manufacturing business. He made good profits in the year ended 5 April 2008, but unfortunately anticipates a loss in his accounts in the year ended 5 April 2009. He can claim the new loss rules brought in by the Pre-Budget Report, which enables this loss to be carried back to offset against his profits for the previous year (2007/08).</p><p>Or a limited loss of £50,000 can be carried back to the tax years ending 5 April 2007 or indeed the year ending 5 April 2006.</p><p>So all is not lost. Dust off the calculator and start saving tax</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/slumdog-or-millionaire/">Slumdog or Millionaire?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk">Wilkins Southworth</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/slumdog-or-millionaire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax efficient business sale</title>
		<link>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/tax-efficient-business-sale/</link>
					<comments>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/tax-efficient-business-sale/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris-Wilkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 16:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wilkinssouthworth.live-website.com/?p=793</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A client had a business that he proposed to sell for in excess of £3million. By utilising his non UK domiciled tax status, we set up a trust in the Isle of Man. The shares owned by the trust were bearer shares, such that even though our client was UK tax resident, he did not pay any tax on the sale of those shares.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/tax-efficient-business-sale/">Tax efficient business sale</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk">Wilkins Southworth</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="793" class="elementor elementor-793" data-elementor-post-type="post">
						<section class="elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-c17aea7 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no wpr-column-slider-no wpr-equal-height-no" data-id="c17aea7" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-3f0beec" data-id="3f0beec" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-d1ee965 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="d1ee965" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<h2>A client had a business that he proposed to sell for in excess of £3million.</h2>
By utilising his non UK domiciled tax status, we set up a trust in the Isle of Man. The shares owned by the trust were bearer shares, such that even though our client was UK tax resident, he did not pay <b>any tax</b> on the sale of those shares.								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/tax-efficient-business-sale/">Tax efficient business sale</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk">Wilkins Southworth</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/tax-efficient-business-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Structuring a property company to save tax</title>
		<link>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/structuring-a-property-company-to-save-tax/</link>
					<comments>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/structuring-a-property-company-to-save-tax/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris-Wilkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 15:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wilkinssouthworth.live-website.com/?p=778</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A client came to us who had a large property company.  After exploring the way the company had been structured by the company’s previous firm of Chartered Accountants, we advised on a different tax structure.  This entailed revising prior year accounts and restructuring the balance sheet.  This resulted in a Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) 8 Prior Year Adjustment to the financial statements which increased the trading loss in the company for tax purposes by approximately £250,000 thus creating a tax loss to carry forward against future years profits and creating a tax asset of approximately £65,000.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/structuring-a-property-company-to-save-tax/">Structuring a property company to save tax</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk">Wilkins Southworth</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="778" class="elementor elementor-778" data-elementor-post-type="post">
						<section class="elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-d4a7c58 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no wpr-column-slider-no wpr-equal-height-no" data-id="d4a7c58" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-90c4833" data-id="90c4833" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-e131e94 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="e131e94" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<div class="csc-header csc-header-n1"><h2 class="csc-firstHeader"><span style="font-size: 16px;">A client came to us who had a large property company. </span></h2></div><p>After exploring the way the company had been structured by the company’s previous firm of Chartered Accountants, we advised on a different tax structure. </p><p>This entailed revising prior year accounts and restructuring the balance sheet.  This resulted in a Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) 8 Prior Year Adjustment to the financial statements which increased the trading loss in the company for tax purposes by approximately £250,000 thus creating a tax loss to carry forward against future years profits and creating a tax asset of approximately <b>£65,000</b>.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/structuring-a-property-company-to-save-tax/">Structuring a property company to save tax</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk">Wilkins Southworth</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/structuring-a-property-company-to-save-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inheritance Tax Planning</title>
		<link>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/elementor-771/</link>
					<comments>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/elementor-771/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris-Wilkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 15:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wilkinssouthworth.live-website.com/?p=771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Inheritance tax planning saves £124,000 A client wanted us to do some inheritance tax planning on their estate.  The client was a divorced man in his late sixties with one daughter and two properties – one that he lived in and one that he rented out.  He had already worked out that he had to pay over £160,000 in inheritance tax upon his death on the sale of his rental property, but he did not want to burden his daughter with such a large debt and asked us to try and mitigate this. We worked out that by making a principal private residence election on the rented property (he lived there, moved to his current house, then rented his old house to tenants), claiming a lettings exemption, his capital gains tax exemption and undertaking further tax mitigation, he could gift the property to his daughter and pay just £36,000 capital gains tax – a saving of £124,000!</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/elementor-771/">Inheritance Tax Planning</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk">Wilkins Southworth</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="771" class="elementor elementor-771" data-elementor-post-type="post">
						<section class="elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-b8c44c6 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no wpr-column-slider-no wpr-equal-height-no" data-id="b8c44c6" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-6b15290" data-id="6b15290" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-4f53f93 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="4f53f93" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<div class="csc-header csc-header-n1"><h2 class="csc-firstHeader">Inheritance tax planning saves £124,000</h2></div><p>A client wanted us to do some inheritance tax planning on their estate. </p><p>The client was a divorced man in his late sixties with one daughter and two properties – one that he lived in and one that he rented out.  He had already worked out that he had to pay over £160,000 in inheritance tax upon his death on the sale of his rental property, but he did not want to burden his daughter with such a large debt and asked us to try and mitigate this.</p><p>We worked out that by making a principal private residence election on the rented property (he lived there, moved to his current house, then rented his old house to tenants), claiming a lettings exemption, his capital gains tax exemption and undertaking further tax mitigation, he could gift the property to his daughter and pay just £36,000 capital gains tax – a saving of <b>£124,000</b>!</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/elementor-771/">Inheritance Tax Planning</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk">Wilkins Southworth</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/elementor-771/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reclassification of expenditure reduces corporation tax liability</title>
		<link>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/reclassification-of-expenditure-reduces-corporation-tax-liability/</link>
					<comments>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/reclassification-of-expenditure-reduces-corporation-tax-liability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris-Wilkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 09:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wilkinssouthworth.live-website.com/?p=752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A client came to us to handle the accounting and tax affairs of his property company. The company was making a loss, however the director expected it to make significant profits in a few year’s time. Upon review of the prior year’s financial statements, we identified that £90,000 of revenue expenditure in respect of repairs had been misclassified as leasehold improvements, which they could not obtain tax relief for. We reclassified this expenditure from leasehold improvements to revenue expenditure via a Prior Year Adjustment to the financial statements, this meant that the company’s losses were enhanced by £90,000. Furthermore, we identified £45,000 of expenditure, which the company had misclassified as capital expenditure in their records for the current year’s financial statements. We reclassified this as revenue expenditure to further enhance their corporation tax losses by £135,000 (£90,000 + £45,000). The corporation tax losses were carried forward and offset against the company’s trading profits for the following year, thereby saving them corporation tax of £28,350.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/reclassification-of-expenditure-reduces-corporation-tax-liability/">Reclassification of expenditure reduces corporation tax liability</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk">Wilkins Southworth</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="752" class="elementor elementor-752" data-elementor-post-type="post">
						<section class="elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-edd569b elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no wpr-column-slider-no wpr-equal-height-no" data-id="edd569b" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-0512376" data-id="0512376" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-61d6591 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="61d6591" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<h2>A client came to us to handle the accounting and tax affairs of his property company.</h2>
The company was making a loss, however the director expected it to make significant profits in a few year’s time. Upon review of the prior year’s financial statements, we identified that £90,000 of revenue expenditure in respect of repairs had been misclassified as leasehold improvements, which they could not obtain tax relief for.

We reclassified this expenditure from leasehold improvements to revenue expenditure via a Prior Year Adjustment to the financial statements, this meant that the company’s losses were enhanced by £90,000. Furthermore, we identified £45,000 of expenditure, which the company had misclassified as capital expenditure in their records for the current year’s financial statements. We reclassified this as revenue expenditure to further enhance their corporation tax losses by £135,000 (£90,000 + £45,000).

The corporation tax losses were carried forward and offset against the company’s trading profits for the following year, thereby saving them corporation tax of <b>£28,350</b>.								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/reclassification-of-expenditure-reduces-corporation-tax-liability/">Reclassification of expenditure reduces corporation tax liability</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk">Wilkins Southworth</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://wilkinssouthworth.co.uk/reclassification-of-expenditure-reduces-corporation-tax-liability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
